Relevant Explanations: Allowing Disjunctive Assignments
نویسنده
چکیده
Relevance-based explanation is a scheme in which partial assignments to Bayesian belief network variables are explanations ( abduc tive conclusions). We allow variables to re main unassigned in explanations as long as they are irrelevant to the explanation, where irrelevance is defined in terms of statistical in dependence. When multiple-valued variables exist in the system, especially when subsets of values correspond to natural types of events, the overspecification problem, alleviated by independence-based explanation, resurfaces. As a solution to that, as well as for address ing the question of explanation specificity, it is desirable to collapse such a subset of val ues into a single value on the fly. The equiv alent method, which is adopted here, is to generalize the notion of assignments to allow disjunctive assignments. We proceed to define generalized indepen dence based explanations as maximum poste rior probability independence based general ized assignments (GIB-MAPs). GIB assign ments are shown to have certain properties that ease the deJ>ign of algorithms for com puting GIB-MAPs. One such algorithm is discussed here, as well as suggestions for how other algorithms may be adapted to com pute GIB-MAPs. GIB-MAP explanations still suffer from instability, a problem which may be addressed using "approximate" con ditional independence as a condition for ir relevance.
منابع مشابه
Justifications for programs with disjunctive and causal-choice rules
In this paper, we study an extension of the stable model semantics for disjunctive logic programs where each true atom in a model is associated with an algebraic expression (in terms of rule labels) that represents its justifications. As in our previous work for non-disjunctive programs, these justifications are obtained in a purely semantic way, by algebraic operations (product, addition and a...
متن کاملDisjunctive Explanations
Abductive logic programming has been widely used to declaratively specify a variety of problems in AI including updates in data and knowledge bases, belief revision, diagnosis, causal theory, and default reasoning. One of the most signi cant issues in abductive logic programming is to develop a reasonable method for knowledge assimilation, which incorporates obtained explanations into the curre...
متن کاملLink Oping Electronic Articles in Disjunctive Explanations in Abductive Logic Programming
Given some evidence or observation, abduction infers candidate hypotheses to explain such an observation. In this paper, we consider the case in which multiple explanations exist but we cannot select one from them. Our approach leaves the decision inde nite, but o ers a consistent way to theory changes. A disjunctive explanation, which is a disjunction of possible alternative explanations, is i...
متن کاملAvicenna's Anatomical Legacy as Seen Through the Relevant Topics in Modern Anat-omy
Background: Makhaarej Al-Horouf, the study of speech sounds by Avicenna is a valuable piece of work in the study of speech sounds, which was written about ten centuries ago. It contains six chapters on sound, anatomy of vocal tract, and phonetics. It is amazing to find that Avicenna’s explanations are congruent with the findings of modern scholarship in relevant topics. The study was intended t...
متن کاملOn the Complexity of Ontological Reasoning under Disjunctive Existential Rules
Ontology-based data access is an emerging yet powerful technology that allows to enhance a classical relational database with an ontology in order to infer new intensional knowledge. Recently, Datalog+/was introduced with the purpose of providing tractable reasoning algorithms for expressive ontology languages. In this framework, Datalog is extended by features such as existential quantificatio...
متن کامل